Probation Service Christian Fellowship. (PSCF)     

Christian Care and Concern in the Criminal Justice Services

Home   Contacts   Membership

Questions to the PSCF - or "Frequently asked questions" 

1) What is your role as a Probation Officer?  Are there particular specialisms? 

2) What is the deciding factor between a custodial sentence and a community sentence?   

3) Which crimes are taken the most seriously apart from murder or crimes of a sexual nature?  

 4) How do the members view the way in which sex offenders are often treated both by society and by their fellow offenders (of crimes other than sexual) and the work of such organisations as Circles of Support?  Do they see Circles as a useful and helpful way of dealing with the offenders rather than just the general knee-jerk public reaction?  

 5) Why are there so few women in the Probation Service i.e. only 10% to 90%?  Is it because it is too risky for women to deal with characters that may at times prove a little challenging?  

 6) The former value base of the Probation Service was to advise, assist and befriend now it is to enforcement, rehabilitation and public protection, do you feel that this new philosophy fits less comfortably with the Christian Ethos of PSCF?  

 7) Apparently Probation Officers are warned nowadays not to pray with their clients.  How do you get around this dictat?

 8) What is the role of the Membership Secretary of the PSCF?  

 9) How does the organisation try to fulfil its original motto of “Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit”?

-------------------------------------------------------------

1) What is your role as a Probation Officer?  Are there particular specialisms? 

A: The main role of Probation Officers is to supervise offenders who are serving sentences in the community and those who have been released from prison on licence. This involves risk assessment and risk management, including work aimed at reducing the risk of re-offending. Our work with an individual offender usually starts with the preparation of a Pre-sentence Report (PSR) to assist the Court with sentencing; this includes an analysis of the offence, relevant background information, an assessment of the risk posed by that offender and a proposal for sentencing.

There are various specialisms, including resettlement teams, which focus on working with people in prison and those who are released on licence. One of the aims of this work is to assist the offender to settle back into the community. Other Probation staff work delivering accredited groupwork programmes, such as Think First, the aims of which are to improve offenders’ decision-making and problem-solving skills. Other staff supervise offenders on Community Punishment Orders, who perform unpaid work for the benefit of the community. Yet others manage offenders with substance abuse problems who are subject to Drug Treatment and Testing Orders.

2) What is the deciding factor between a custodial sentence and a community sentence? 

A: Although government policy is that custody should be reserved for the most serious offenders in order to protect the public from harm, there are many less serious offenders in our prisons. This is as a result of many factors: sometimes offenders have persistently failed to comply with community sentences and the Courts find themselves without viable alternatives; sometimes offenders have committed high-value offences (such as fraud or theft from employer) in breach of trust and the Court considers such offences “so serious” that custody is justified, even though the offender does not represent a risk of harm. Persistent, non-violent offenders, both young and old find themselves remanded in custody if they have failed to attend Court, or if they continue to commit offences whilst on bail. Those remanded in custody are held in local prisons, which often do have quite stringent regimes, as they hold all categories of offenders. However young offenders (i.e. those under 21) should usually be held separately from older prisoners. It is a concern that many people who have been held in custody on remand are either acquitted or are given community sentences: the cost to the taxpayer is huge and the social cost to the individual can be enormous: many lose their homes and jobs and family relationships can be severely strained.  

back to top of page

 3) Which crimes are taken the most seriously apart from murder or crimes of a sexual nature?

A: You have highlighted two of the most serious types of offence. Other offences of violence are also taken most seriously, as are offences in which children are the victims. Sentencers refer to sentencing guidelines, which reflect offence seriousness. For example an offence of burglary will be considered more serious and thus attract a more severe penalty if a dwelling is involved, if the occupiers were present and if damage was caused.

 4) How do the members view the way in which sex offenders are often treated both by society and by their fellow offenders (of crimes other than sexual) and the work of such organisations as Circles of Support?  Do they see Circles as a useful and helpful way of dealing with the offenders rather than just the general knee-jerk public reaction?

A: One driving factor for people working with offenders is belief that people can change. This must include sex offenders. These individuals are often the target of abuse from certain sectors of the press and can also be the objects of hatred and attack from other prisoners. Most sex offenders are released into the community and it is one of our tasks to assist them to resettle into the community. However we also have to ensure that the public is protected from further similar offending. Thus schemes such as “Circles of Support” have huge benefit, as do Sex Offender Treatment programmes. There are also hostels which will take such offenders; some of these, such as one run by Stepping Stones Trust are run by Christians and help residents find suitable employment.

 5) Why are there so few women in the Probation Service i.e. only 10% to 90%?  Is it because it is too risky for women to deal with characters that may at times prove a little challenging?

A: I think you have mis-read the statistics: it is 90% of the offenders who are male, not the staff. I don’t actually have the data for male/ female staff, but experience suggests that most are female. I am sure that most of us would consider ourselves capable of dealing with all offender groups, however challenging their behaviour might be: cases are not allocated according to the gender of the member of staff.

 6) The former value base of the Probation Service was to advise, assist and befriend now it is to enforcement, rehabilitation and public protection, do you feel that this new philosophy fits less comfortably with the Christian Ethos of PSCF?

A: At first sight it could appear that the current objectives of “enforcement, rehabilitation and public protection” might not be such a neat fit with a Christian perspective. However the Probation Service probably was a little too woolly at the time when I joined in the 70s, when we would accept almost any explanation for an absence. It has been said that it is not possible to do any effective work unless an offender actually attends his or her appointments, so we have to ensure that they attend. The rehabilitation aspect is what most of us came into the job to do: that is to assist individuals to make the changes that are necessary to live a useful life in the community; this could be by helping them address their substance abuse problems, or by undertaking an anger control programme; we might even offer them advice sometimes! The objective of public protection is about reducing the risk of further offending, something which has always been a main part of what we do. So in effect we do still advise and assist and one effective way of doing this is by developing a constructive relationship with offenders: we probably wouldn’t call this befriending now, but maybe things haven’t really changed that much.  

back to top of page

 7) Apparently Probation Officers are warned nowadays not to pray with their clients.  How do you get around this dictat?

A: When I became a Probation Officer, I saw this as Christian service, trying to help one of the most vulnerable and marginalised groups in our society. However I am a public servant, not an evangelist or chaplain. If an offender asked me how he or she could find out more about the Christian faith, then I would do my best to link that person with a suitable fellowship or pastor. I also support and endorse the work of the prison chaplains, Prison Fellowship and Alpha in Prisons and other Christian groups working with offenders.

 8) What is the role of the Membership Secretary of the PSCF?

A: The Membership Secretary keeps in touch with our members, offering them encouragement and support in their work. He has recently helped set up a network of Christian Trainee Probation Officers, which I believe they have found helpful. He also encourages enquirers to become members and to get more involved with the Fellowship.

 9) How does the organisation try to fulfil its original motto of “Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit”?

A: Working with offenders can be very demanding. I have often been aware of complex situations with no easy solutions. Committing such situations to God in prayer does help and I feel privileged that I have this additional resource available to me. Some years ago our fellowship urged its members to pray for the Fellowship and its aims on Monday mornings. This is something we need to consider adopting again.

Margaret Gateley  8.9.04

back to top of page